|
| These articles were written in 1999. Please refer to current regulatory guidance for compliance purposes.
Electronic Flight Bag
Transitioning to a paperless environment requires more than
technology.
By Anita Trotter-Cox,
President, Assessment Compliance Group, ATP/CFII. GI, GIV, IAI 1124
 |
|
Jeppesen's JeppView display is a technology designed to
reduce paper in the cockpit. This PED allows the pilot
to call up area charts, approach plates, SIDs & STARs,
checklists and other flight management info.
|
Pilots have long recognized
the benefits of utilizing laptop computers to perform a variety
of job-related functions. We currently have airplane flight manuals
(AFM), flight operations manuals, international operations manuals,
maintenance manuals, minimum equipment lists (MELs), aircraft
performance data, navigation publications, company standard operating
procedures (SOPs), record keeping systems, etc. on CDs and on
our hard drives. Connecting to the Internet or intranet for such
information as company mail, documents, revisions to those documents,
schedules, and weather is becoming very commonplace. Accessing
and referencing this information in digital format just seems
to make life easier.
Originally, portable electronic devices (PED) were approved
as a direct replacement for hard copy Jeppesen chart information
carried in the pilot's flight bag. Hence, the term "electronic
flight bag" (EFB). With the increasing functional capabilities
of the EFB, operators are now seeking approval for these same
devices, along with multifunction EFBs and other commercial off
the shelf (COTS) options for use on the flightdeck and/or cabin
during preflight, inflight, and postflight operations. The objective
is to increase safety of flight by reducing pilot workload and
increasing the speed and accuracy of information retrieval.
Functions and roles
EFB functions range from electronically displaying company
policies and preflight planning to very complex functions such
as display of real time information and primary flight displays.
The simplest role of the EFB is to provide efficient information
storage and access. The more complex functions require communication
with external sources such as aircraft subsystems, datalink capable
of depicting near real-time weather graphic displays and NOTAMs,
ground station communications, supplemental see and avoid and
terrain mapping.
This take-along technology or installed multifunction display
(MFD) will also support SOPs in high workload or high-distraction
situations. The EFB offers the potential of enhancing crew coordination
by providing a clear definition of crew responsibilities, roles
and actions in procedures and checklists.
As a decision-making support tool, the EFB will allow crewmembers
to access all information and pull together relevant data in a
cohesive manner. Information based on content rather than source
can be organized and presented to the crew by the EFB. However,
the information displayed should also be readily traceable to
its source. With hyperlinking, bookmarking, cross-referencing,
navigation, search and connection to online continuous updates,
this potent portable can provide us with almost limitless functionalities.
Ultimately the EFB is envisioned as a flight management tool that
will aid the crew's information management and decision-making
capabilities.
Displays
Displays may be in the form of a laptop, electronic book,
tablet computers (high tech clipboard), or actually installed
on the aircraft as a MFD. The format of the presentation will
vary depending on your aircraft requirements and budget. Since
there will not be heavy data entry, some EFBs may not have keyboards,
but stylists. When flying into Nirata, you may be told to hold
at Kasmi "as published." Today, you'd have to page through
several arrivals to find the published Hold (it's not on the enroute
chart). But soon, you will be able to "point and click"
or even use voice recognition to make the published Hold appear
on the EFB.
|
(L) Royal Air Capt Nick Roosevelt uses the WSI weather station
at Signature DCA, while
(R) Schering-Plough Fixed-Wing Chief Pilot Peter Eisenbarth uses
a laptop computer to call up a preflight checklist. Although intended
to make the pilot's job easier, the transition from FBO
desktop to flightdeck laptop may not be so easy. It's important
that both the regulatory
agencies and operators address human factors issues. |
Pending regulations and guidance
EFB equipment can be classified from a self-contained independent
system to a system with multiple datalink capabilities that interface
with the aircraft systems. The approval process will obviously
depend on the functions of the device and the overall effects
on safety. An Advisory Circular entitled Operational Approval
of Portable Flight Data Equipment "The Electronic Flight
Bag" (AC 120-EFB) is currently in the predraft stage.
The AC is intended to support this technology in achieving safety
and system efficiency goals. Policy guidance specific to EFB certification
is forthcoming.
The challenge is to write guidance for certification and approval
for EFBs that do not interface with the aircraft electronically
or mechanically (stand-alone) as well as EFBs that interface with
the aircraft local area network (eg ARINC 429 bus) or a proprietary
VHF network. This equipment would allow the flightcrews to transfer
data both to and from existing aircraft avionics (eg FMS), and
aircraft communications sub-networks (eg VHF, satcom, etc.) These
high-end installations will be subject to 14 CFR FAR 25 regulations.,/p>
The transition to a paperless (or near paperless) flightdeck
will probably require some level of approval. Policy guidance
may also address media such as CD-ROM, DVD and the Internet for
revisions and updates. The revision process should ensure that
the user knows that the latest information is in the database.
Date-sensitive software can be updated manually or through ground
datalink such as the Internet (ground use), ACARS or airborne
datalink (inflight use) such as satellite data and message service.
The installed EFB software should be compatible with the airborne
system software with which it interfaces, or the airborne system
should itself provide means of protection from corrupted uploaded
data or inappropriate user action that could effect the safety
or airworthiness of the airborne system. This includes protection
from software viruses or defects of any software on the EFB.
Although some existing guidelines may be applied (eg Electronic
Checklists AC 120-64 and use of CD-ROM Systems AC 120-69) FAA/Industry
partnerships are working aggressively on the usability guidelines
specific to the functional requirements of the EFB. Since the
EFB can be used on a variety of aircraft types, some of the determining
factors for approval and certification are the type of operation,
the type of device being used, how the device is being used, and
how and where it is located in the aircraft. An additional consideration
in determining the level of certification and standards to which
it was designed is how the device interfaces with the aircraft
and what effects its failure may have on the aircraft systems.
Broad guidelines are currently being written for air carriers.
However, the needs of general aviation have been kept in mind.
Initially fleetwide equipage will be financially more attractive
to the corporate flight department than to a large air carrier.
|
With the Universal
Cockpit Display from Universal Avionics, approach plates, SIDs
& STARs from Jeppesen, FMS data pages, complete AFM, Unilink
weather data, radar and TAWS images are all accessible. |
 |
Operational standards and
practices
The EFB should have at least the same degree of accuracy and
integrity as the paper system it will eventually replace. One
database, one document to electronically revise will reduce the
opportunity for error, provide a more efficient means of distribution,
and reduce publishing costs. Many air carriers and quite a few
corporate operators are currently utilizing this simple function
of the EFB.
As with any introduction of new technology into flight operations,
operators should establish standard practices and procedures for
flightdeck use of EFBs to include crew resource management (CRM),
normal, abnormal or degraded mode use. Operators should also consider
the impact on crew workload in developing policies and procedures
for EFB use in the new paperless environment. The same manuals
should be made available in printed form as well as an alternate
means of accessing information (eg calling dispatch or using a
second EFB).
Requirements for maintenance and support of the computer platforms,
including provisions for outages and necessary alternative retrieval
services, should be planned and spelled out. Unauthorized modification
of the database should be prevented. When it actually does replace
paper, the inoperative status will have to be addressed. If EFB
is a regulatory requirement and has not been added to the MMEL,
then it would not be a deferrable item.
 |
UPS Aviation Technologies MX20's flexible, open architecture
design enables pilots to display the latest airspace management
tools such as Stormscope data, datalink weather, traffic information
and flight information services. This MFD is also certified to
show ADS-B traffic reports. |
If the EFB relies only on its own battery power, it must be
sufficient for the duration of the flight including diversion
to your alternate. Depending on the classification of the equipment,
the EFB may include a connection to the aircraft for primary or
backup power as well as a battery backup for electrical failures.
Other important battery considerations include battery overcharge
and rapid decompression.
The use of EFBs may require training of operations personnel
including dispatch and maintenance. Training should not only address
operational use and security awareness but also policy and procedures
for system operation. Online or system tutorials and interactive
exercises should be available to the user prior to the installation
of the equipment. If the EFB has been retrofitted or added as
a stand-alone EFB, is it compatible with the previous flightdeck
philosophy? Any incompatibilities and/or functionalities should
be incorporated into initial and recurrent training depending
on the type of operation and the intended use. Since the EFB is
a dynamic tool whose functionality will not remain static, general
aviation must ensure that crews are familiar with the operation
of the EFB and knowledgeable of its system components and operation,
failure indications and backup procedures, limitations and maintenance
reporting procedures.
E-transitions
As in all technology intended for pilots, the information
must be dynamic and under the control of the pilot. E-reading
is different from reading print on paper. We tend to read somewhat
slower from computer screens than we do from print. Will we want
to read lengthy document text at a reduced reading speed? Hopefully,
this should be resolved with the rapid advancement in display
technology (higher resolutions). E-readers still feel uneasy about
the disappearance of text or where they have been or how much
further they have to go to the end of the topic. E-content can
be challenging without the sense of context or depth. Page turning
continues to be a difficult interface.
If the EFB is used as a checklist, how will the pilot's actions
be recorded? Could pilots performing the checklist items be so
engrossed and focused on the electronic checklist items that they
become left out of the loop? Will the lack of a click, check or
button pushed be recorded in the database for analysis by management
and/or investigators at a future date?
The transition from paper to an electronic display will eventually
be in a manner other than plain text. Information overload can
quickly become an issue. Although the information should be identical
in substance regardless of the output form, universal standardized
symbology or icons will resolve some of these concerns. The flightdeck
environment demands evaluation of additional issues such as headdown
time, turbulence, darkness, or bright sunlight. Think about the
driver and the cell phonewill the EFB be a distraction or
a support tool?
The technology is here, the certification requirements are
in progress, but we are all part of a system that is evolving
at a different rate in different parts of the world. For example,
real-time weather information must be shared by both pilot and
controller. If the controller is using weather that is 15-20 min
old, there could be conflicting opinions rather than collaborative
resolutions.
The good news is that human factors guidelines are being developed
along with establishing the approval certification process. Needing
an objective method of evaluating EFBs, the FAA (AAR-100) is sponsoring
the Volpe National Transportation Center in Cambridge MA to accomplish
this task. They are working in partnership with industry through
the Air Transport Association (ATA) Chart and Data Display Committee
- Digital Display Working Group (DDWG) which is chaired by Bill
LeRoy of USAirways (Bill_LeRoy@usairways.com).
Summary
Getting comfortable to the paperless environment and depending
on this strange host that holds our information will prove to
be operationally beneficial and ultimately enhance our situational
awareness. This technology is here but the certification and approval
process still lags. However, FAA is addressing the human factors
issues simultaneously and preparing guidance to be utilized by
all FSDOs for the full spectrum of EFB applications and functions.
The critical issue that faces general aviation is if the industry
will be operationally prepared with standards and procedures in
place to support the transition to the wide range of EFB functions
or will the EFB just appear one day in our newly purchased aircraft
with inadequate pilot guides and training programs. No doubt the
EFB will become an indispensable tool for all aviation in our
concerted effort to find a more effective flight management tool
and improved safety of flight.
Anita Trotter-Cox is President of Assessment Compliance
Group, located in Annapolis MD, and provides flight departments
(Part 91, 135 and 121) with International operations procedures
manuals and support for standardized procedures for advanced technologies.
(www.aviationmanuals.com).
All pages copyright ©1999,
Queensmith Communications Corp. All rights reserved.
|